Responsive web design: What goes around…

“Responsive Web Design essentially indicates that a web site is crafted to adapt the layout to the environment that it is being viewed in.”1

At Generation X it has always been a first principle to consider the wide variety of user platforms when designing websites. Cross browser compatibility and varied browser resolutions have always been tested as an inherant part of the design process since I first began designing websites in 2003, so the concept of responsive web design is not new to me.

The term responsive web design, however, first came to my attention last month when I read an article by James Pearce entitled Not a mobile web, merely a 320px-wide one2, orginally written in October 2010 in response to Ethan Marcotte’s seminal article3 on A List Apart.

Proponents of responsive web design seem to fall into two camps – the purists and the adaptives. The distinction lies in whether exactly the same information is presented across all platforms – the purist arguemnt – or whether the design should respond to different platforms by delivering “different content and services altogether – or, at least, a differently prioritized version of the default desktop experience”.2 As is so often the case, both sides of the argument have much to recommend them.

Allied to the concept of responsive web design is that of Mobile First,4 whereby web applications and websites are designed for mobile devices first, rather than the mobile version being adapted from the desktop version. The case for Mobile First is argued in the book of the same title, by Luke Wroblewski.

I should point out that responsive web design principles have (not yet) been applied to this WordPress blog.

1 Responsive Web Design, Wikipedia
2 Not a mobile web, merely a 320px-wide one, by James Pearce
3 Responsive Web Design, by Ethan Marcotte
4 Mobile First by Luke Wroblewski

3 thoughts on “Responsive web design: What goes around…”

  1. Have yoou ever thought about adding a little bitt more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is important and everything.
    However imagine if you added sokme great images or videos to give your posts more,
    “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and clips, this blog could definiktely be one
    oof the very best in its niche. Fantastic blog!

  2. For newest information you have to pay a visit intertnet
    and on the web I found this weeb site as a best web page for mmost recent updates.One off many essential courses
    to cracking these early duplicate caractère was to run a program that reproduces the typical CPU operation. The
    CPU test system offers various additional elements to the programmer, for example, the capacity to single-stride through every processor course
    alsoo to look at the CPU enrolls and altered memory spaces as the recreatiopn runs (any present day disassembler/debugger can do this).
    The Apple 2 gave an inherent opcode disassembler, permitting cruude storage to be decoded into CPU
    opcodes, and this would be taken to check what the duplicate
    security was going to do next. Generally there was practically zero safeguuard accessible to the duplicate confidence framework, since each
    one of its insider facts are made noticeable through the recreation. Notwithstanding,
    on the grounds that the recreation itself must keep running on the first CPU,
    notwithstanding the pdoduct being hacked, thee
    reenactment would frequently set yyou back a great level slowly but
    surely even at most extreme speed. On Atari
    8-bit PCs, tthe most widely recognized insurance strategy was
    through “terrible areas”. These were segments on the circle that were deliberately muddled by the plate drive.

    The product would search for these segments when the program was stacking and would quiut stacking
    if a mistake code was noot returned while getting to areas.
    Extraordinbary duplicate tasks were accessible
    that would duplicate the plate and recollect any terrible parts.
    The client could then utilize an application to show the drive byy continuously perusing
    a solitary part and possess the drive REVOLTION PER MINUTE.

    Together with the circle drive whip evacuaged a little electric screwdriver could be applied
    to fair the drive RPM beneath a specific point.
    Whenn the drive was supported offf the application could then go and create
    “terrible areas” where required. With the point
    when done the drive RPM was accelerated back to typical and
    an uncracked copy was made. Obviously busting the product to expect great areas made for promptly duplicated plates without the need to get in the way with the
    circle drive. As time went on more refined techniques were created,
    however all included some type off altered plate information, for example,
    a divijsion that may retuirn distinctive information concerning under the radar gets to because of awful information arrangement.

    Products got to be accessible (from organizations, for example,
    Happy Computers) which supplanted the controller BIOS in Atari’s “brilliant” drives.
    These kinds oof overhauled drives permitted the client to make correct of the first program with duplicate assurances established up on the
    neww plate. On the Commodore 64, a few techniques were utilized to secure
    programming. For programming displayed on ROM cartridges, tdrme conseillé were incorporated which pursued to compose
    over the program code. In case thhe product was on RANGE OF MOTION, nothing would happen, yet when the
    product got been moved to RAM MEMORY, the product would
    be debilitated. In view of the procedure of Commodore floppy
    drives, one create assurance plan would bring
    abut the floppy drive make a beeline for strike against the end
    of its rail, which could lead to the drige make a beeline for get to be
    out of alignment. At times, split varieties of programming were alluring to stay from
    this end result. A misaligned drive mind was uncommon foor the most part altering
    itself by crrushing against the rail stops.
    Another severe security plan was bashing from track 1 to 40
    and back a couple times. Vast the greater part of the early coding wafers were PC specialists who frequently shaped event that went up against the other person in the emptying
    and spreading of coding. Breaking another duplicate confidence conspire as soopn ass would be prudent was frequently viewed as a
    chance to show their specialized prevalence rather
    than a probability of cash making. Some low talented specialists wwould take
    officially break up programming and alter different decoded strings of content in it to change messages an amusement would tell a
    diversion player, frequently something considered potent.
    Transferring the modified doubles on record sharing systerms gave a wellspring of snickers to grown-up clients.

    The wafer gatherings of the 1980s started out to publicize themselves
    and their aptitudes by connecting vivified screens known as break in the action intrdoductions in the product programs they split and discharged.
    Once the particular rivalry had extended
    from the difficulties of cracking to the difficulties of maaking outwardly staggering opening paragraphs, the
    establishments another subculture known as demoscene were set up.
    Demoscene commenced to separate ittself
    from the illcit “warez scene” amid thhe 1990s and is currently viewed as
    a totally extraordinary subculture. Numerous poduct
    saltines have lter devfeloped into greatly competent programming figures away; the profound leaning
    of gathering required keeping in mind the end goal to spllit securities
    enables those to figure out motorists to port them from double drivers for Home windows to drivers with source code for
    Linux and other free working frames. Additionally because of the fact that music and diversion introduction was such an essential piece of gaming
    the music firm and representation turned away to be exceptionally well known when equipment have tto be reasonable for the home client.
    With the ascent of the web, coding saltines created hidden online associations.
    In the previous 50% of the nineties, a standout amidst the most regarded wellsprings of data about “programming security switching” wass Fravia’s site.
    The majority of the outstanding oor “first class” breaking bunches make coding splits completely for consideratioon in “The Scene”, not benefit.

    From that point, the splits are in the long run leaking onto open Internet spots by individuals/wafers who utilize very much ensured/secure FILE TRANSFER PROTOCOL discharge chronicles, that are made into full duplicates and today and again sold criminally by different
    gatherings. Thhe Scene today is formed of little gatherings of gifted individuals,
    whoo everything needed contend to have tthe best saltines,
    techniques for splitting, and determining.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *